I appreciated reading Ronald Glasberg’s article “Bridging Academe’s Assessment Divide”
in your March Bulletin. I share many of Professor Glasberg’s views about teaching in the humanities. My happiest time teaching is where I can relinquish control and have students engage each other directly in asking and pondering profound questions of our history and contemporary humanity and environmental care.
I have often been reminded of the grade police whose concerns are grade inflation and lowering of standards. More of us who share Professor Glasberg’s philosophy about teaching and accountability should band together to create a real alternative to the quantitative dominance. Please continue the good work in bringing ethical issues in higher education to our attention in your timely publications.
University of British Columbia
Letters to the Editor
Letters for publication are welcome. Letters should address a specific article, comment, or letter that recently appeared in the paper or be tied to recent events. Letters are limited to 300 words and may be edited for length and clarity. Include your name, address and phone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted. Submissions that are considered potentially libellous will not be published. We read every letter we receive and every letter gets equal consideration. Publication is at the sole discretion of CAUT. If your letter is accepted for publication, you will be contacted by phone, electronic mail, fax or return mail. Letters should be sent to email@example.com